Website audit

Send four visitors through your website. See what they think.

Three real buyer types and one AI agent walk your site, page by page, and narrate the friction as they hit it — then score it and tell you what to fix first.

  • Takes about two minutes
  • No signup to see your score
  • Tests AI-agent readability
0.0/10

Report findings

Website audit

aztechbuildings.co.nz

A proof-rich builder that publishes prices, runs a genuinely capable 3D designer and surfaces its primary CTA clearly on desktop; the friction left is real but focused — an on-load popup, a mobile header that hides the main CTA, and a three-hop route to a quote.

August 31, 2026
Lead generation
Full
Visit the site
7.7
/ 10
Strong
8.9
AI readability

Aztech Buildings is a proof-rich NZ shed builder with real strengths — published pricing (from $32,510 +GST), a genuinely capable 3D shed designer, and a prominent "Design your shed" CTA in the desktop header. A live UX walk surfaces focused friction rather than a broken path: a marketing popup interrupts on load, the mobile header hides the primary CTA (it only appears inline after scrolling), and reaching a quote spans three domain hops. The path completes; the polish is in the first-impression and mobile experience.

What this site is

What they do
New Zealand shed and barn builder (HubSpot CMS): custom clear-span pole sheds, dairy/composting barns, industrial steel buildings, rural and lifestyle sheds, sold nationwide via a design-and-quote enquiry from a Cambridge base.
Who it is for
New Zealand rural, lifestyle and commercial buyers: dairy and drystock farmers, lifestyle-block owners, and industrial/commercial operators needing sheds, barns, feedpad covers, workshops, hangars and warehouses.
Sectors
Agriculture & Dairy; Rural / Lifestyle; Industrial & Commercial; Equine & Aviation
What they sell
Custom-designed steel and pole buildings: composting/dairy barns and feedpad covers, industrial warehouses/workshops/canopies/hangars, rural and implement sheds, and lifestyle/boat/equine sheds. Clear-span "gravity defying" spans; sold as design-and-build with indicative pricing published.
Conversion event
Request a custom design / quote — the "Design your shed" and "Begin your build" CTAs, plus phone 0800 298 324, email hello@aztechbuildings.co.nz and a footer enquiry form. Indicative "Quick AZ" pricing is shown to help buyers self-qualify.
Proof on hand
Thousands of projects across NZ; 20+ named customer testimonials; ~10 project spotlights and case studies (Vos Farms, ITM Matamata, O'Leary composting barn); a quantified outcome (O'Leary: "$300,000 increase per year in Milk Solids"); published indicative pricing; Cambridge address, 0800 number and email; a referral program (up to $1,000).
Buyer facts found
Indicative pricing by shed type and bay count (e.g. 3-bay rural shed from $32,510 +GST); product categories and subcategories; phone 0800 298 324; email hello@aztechbuildings.co.nz; address 222 Peake Road, Cambridge; nationwide coverage; a brochure download.
Buyer facts missing
An enquiry form embedded on the Contact page (it lives on a separate /enquiry page); a stated response time; third-party ratings (Google reviews, awards); an llms.txt; a sitemap declaration in robots.txt.
Machine readability
Strong. Server-rendered HubSpot HTML with prices, products and contact all in extractable text, an accessible sitemap.xml and a clean robots.txt (no AI-crawler blocks). Gaps: no llms.txt, and the sitemap is not declared in robots.txt.

Aztech has the raw materials of a top site — prices, deep proof, a capable designer and a clear desktop CTA. The gains left are focused: calm the on-load popup, surface the primary CTA in the mobile header, cut the hops to the designer, and embed the enquiry form on the Contact page.

The four visitors

Cold visitor

First-time visitor

Rural or lifestyle buyer new to Aztech

Awareness

Good

Arrived

Arrived weighing up who could build their shed or barn, deciding whether Aztech is credible and right for a New Zealand build.

Wants

Confidence that Aztech builds their type of shed well, for NZ conditions, with real customers behind it.

Judges on

Clarity of what's offered, local relevance, and believable proof of past builds.

  • Reads "New Zealand's Top Shed & Barn Builders" — clear and confident.
  • Sees the categories — Dairy Barns, Industrial, Rural, Lifestyle — and finds their type.
  • "Sheds built for New Zealand conditions... thousands of projects around NZ" — reassuring scale.
  • Reads the clear-span "gravity defying" technology — a real differentiator, if a little jargony.
  • Scrolls the testimonials — a wall of named NZ customers.
  • Sees project spotlights, including O'Leary's "$300,000 increase per year in milk solids".
  • Clicks "Design your shed" and lands on Aztech's 3D shed designer to start.

Ready to act

Ready-to-build farmer

Farm or lifestyle-block owner ready to price and start a shed

Task execution

Good

Arrived

Knows they want a shed and wants a ballpark price and an easy way to start the design.

Wants

An indicative price to budget, then a working path to a custom quote.

Judges on

Whether pricing is visible, and how smoothly they can start an enquiry.

  • Wants a price and finds the Quick AZ range — "$32,510 +GST" for a 3-bay rural shed.
  • Compares bay options and prices across rural, lifestyle and workshop.
  • Notes prices are +GST and indicative — enough to budget with.
  • Wants to configure and clicks "Design your shed" / "Begin your build".
  • The CTA opens Aztech's 3D shed designer — a genuine self-serve start.
  • For a bespoke build, also has the 0800 number and the hello@ email.
  • Goes to Contact for a form — finds phone, email and address, but the enquiry form is on a separate page.

Comparison shopper

Comparison shopper

Buyer comparing Aztech against other NZ shed builders

Evaluation

Good

Arrived

Weighing Aztech against other shed and barn builders on price transparency, proof and point of difference.

Wants

Visible pricing, believable results, and a clear reason to choose Aztech over a competitor.

Judges on

Price transparency, third-party proof, technology, and coverage.

  • Values that Aztech publishes pricing where many competitors hide it.
  • Weighs the clear-span "gravity defying" technology as a genuine point of difference.
  • Reads the testimonials — including a builder who's built "many Aztech sheds over the last 5 years".
  • Looks for third-party proof (a Google rating, awards) and finds only self-published testimonials.
  • Opens a case study for hard numbers — O'Leary's $300k stands out, but most others are qualitative.
  • Checks coverage — nationwide, with a Cambridge base — reassuring for the build.
  • Leaves impressed by pricing and proof, wanting an easy way to start a quote.

AI agent

AI research agent

LLM assistant researching NZ shed builders on a buyer's behalf

Task execution

Good

Arrived

An answer engine trying to identify NZ shed builders and answer a buyer's price and capability questions.

Wants

Structured product, price and contact data it can extract and quote without a JavaScript barrier.

Judges on

Server-rendered content, extractable prices, crawl policy, and machine-readable structure.

  • Looks for an llms.txt — none (404).
  • Reads server-rendered HubSpot HTML — content present without JavaScript.
  • Extracts pricing cleanly — "$32,510 +GST" for a 3-bay rural shed.
  • Checks robots.txt — no AI-crawler blocks, but no sitemap declared.
  • Finds sitemap.xml directly and enumerates projects and case studies.
  • Pulls contact — the 0800 number, email and the Cambridge address.
  • Extracts the quantified outcome — "$300,000 increase per year in milk solids".
  • Answers "how much is a rural shed in NZ and who builds them" with a real price and a named builder.

Journey feed

Cold visitor

First-time visitor

Homepage

Reads the hero line

"New Zealand's Top Shed & Barn Builders" — clear and confident.

AI agent

AI research agent

llms.txt

Looks for an llms.txt

None here — a 404. I'll work from the HTML and sitemap instead.

Cold visitor

First-time visitor

Homepage

Scans the shed categories

Dairy Barns, Industrial, Rural, Lifestyle — my type is here.

Ready to act

Ready-to-build farmer

Homepage

Looks for a price

Quick AZ pricing — "$32,510 +GST" for a 3-bay rural shed. Finally, a number.

AI agent

AI research agent

Page HTML

Reads server-rendered content

HubSpot serves the copy without JavaScript — easy to parse.

Cold visitor

First-time visitor

Homepage

Reads the NZ-conditions line

"thousands of projects around NZ" — reassuring scale.

Comparison shopper

Comparison shopper

Homepage

Notes the published pricing

Aztech shows prices where a lot of competitors hide them — a plus.

Ready to act

Ready-to-build farmer

Homepage

Compares bay options

Rural, lifestyle, workshop — I can line the prices up and budget.

AI agent

AI research agent

robots.txt

Checks crawl policy

No AI-crawler blocks, but no Sitemap line declared.

Cold visitor

First-time visitor

Homepage

Reads the clear-span tech

"Gravity defying spans" — a real differentiator, if a bit jargony.

Comparison shopper

Comparison shopper

Homepage

Weighs the technology

The clear-span system is a genuine point of difference.

Ready to act

Ready-to-build farmer

Homepage / CTA

Clicks Design your shed

Time to configure my build.

AI agent

AI research agent

Homepage

Extracts pricing

"$32,510 +GST" extracts cleanly as a real, quotable figure.

Cold visitor

First-time visitor

Testimonials

Scrolls the testimonials

A wall of named NZ customers — this feels real.

Comparison shopper

Comparison shopper

Testimonials

Reads a builder's testimonial

"built many Aztech sheds over the last 5 years" — that's a strong signal.

Ready to act

Ready-to-build farmer

Design your shed

Opens the 3D shed designer

The "Design your shed" button opens Aztech's 3D designer — I can configure it myself.

AI agent

AI research agent

sitemap.xml

Enumerates the catalogue

sitemap.xml lists projects, case studies and category pages.

Comparison shopper

Comparison shopper

Homepage

Looks for third-party proof

Lots of testimonials, but no Google rating or awards to verify them.

Cold visitor

First-time visitor

Project spotlight

Sees the O'Leary outcome

"$300,000 increase per year in milk solids" — a number, not just a vibe.

Ready to act

Ready-to-build farmer

Contact

Falls back to phone and email

0800 298 324 and hello@ — at least I can reach them.

Comparison shopper

Comparison shopper

Case study

Opens a case study for numbers

O'Leary's $300k stands out, but most other studies stay qualitative.

AI agent

AI research agent

Contact

Pulls a non-form contact channel

0800 number, email and the Cambridge address — a clean handoff.

Cold visitor

First-time visitor

Contact

Looks for a way to enquire

Contact page has the details but no form to fill in.

Ready to act

Ready-to-build farmer

Contact

Wants an on-page form

Details are here, but I have to hunt the footer for the enquiry form.

Comparison shopper

Comparison shopper

Homepage

Checks coverage

Nationwide, Cambridge base — reassuring for a NZ build.

AI agent

AI research agent

Case study

Extracts the quantified outcome

"$300,000 increase per year in milk solids" — a rare, citable result.

Ready to act

Ready-to-build farmer

Overall

Weighs whether to persist

Great price and proof, but I had to work to actually start an enquiry.

Comparison shopper

Comparison shopper

Overall

Leaves the site

Impressed by pricing and proof; just wants an easy way to start a quote.

AI agent

AI research agent

Store data

Answers a buyer query

"How much is a rural shed in NZ and who builds them?" — answerable with a real price and a named builder.

How each score was reached

Nav Detail binds here.

Navigation & findability: 8.0/10

The desktop navigation is clean and task-oriented — a prominent "Design your shed" CTA plus About, Sheds, Projects, Knowledge Hub and Contact — and the shed categories are well organised. The only real dent is on mobile, where the primary CTA drops out of the header (see the mobile-CTA finding).

  • Desktop header: "Design your shed" button + About, Sheds, Projects, Knowledge Hub, Contact (verified in browser)
  • Mobile header collapses to email, phone and a hamburger; the CTA is not in the header or menu

Message clarity (ICP fit): 8.0/10

The proposition is clear and local — it says exactly what Aztech builds, for whom, and for NZ conditions, in the first line, and the category structure lets each buyer self-select.

  • "New Zealand's Top Shed & Barn Builders"
  • "Sheds built for New Zealand conditions. With thousands of projects around NZ..."
  • "Multi-purpose, quality custom sheds and buildings. Clear-span Pole Sheds, Industrial Steel Sheds, Lifestyle and Farm Buildings."

Trust & credibility: 7.5/10

A genuine wall of proof: 20+ named testimonials, project spotlights, a physical Cambridge address and a referral program. What's missing is third-party validation — a Google rating, awards, or a verifiable years/number stat beyond "thousands of projects".

  • "I build sheds for a few different companies and have built many Aztech sheds over the last 5 years... the most innovative, organized and professional company I have ever built for" — Robbie Reid
  • "thousands of projects around NZ"; address 222 Peake Road, Cambridge

Proof depth: 8.0/10

Unusually strong for the category. Published pricing lets buyers gauge fit, the testimonials are specific and named, and at least one case study lands a hard commercial number rather than a vibe. The gap is that only one study quantifies the outcome.

  • O'Leary composting barn: "$300,000 increase per year in Milk Solids"
  • Quick AZ pricing published, e.g. 3-bay rural shed from "$32,510 +GST"

Conversion path: 7.0/10

Strong ingredients — published prices, a capable 3D designer, a clear desktop CTA, click-to-call and click-to-email, a dedicated enquiry form. The friction a live walk surfaces is focused: a marketing popup interrupts on load, the mobile header hides the primary CTA, reaching a quote spans three domain hops (~5–6 clicks) via a third-party portal, and the enquiry form isn't embedded on the Contact page.

  • Desktop CTA is prominent; on mobile it's absent from the header and only appears inline after scrolling
  • Quote path: homepage → shed-designer landing → third-party client.futura.nz → configure → Get Quote

AI readability: 8.9/10

Arithmetic: readable without JavaScript 3/3 (server-rendered HubSpot) + buyer facts extractable 3/3 (prices, products, contact and address all in the HTML) + structured data present 1/2 (basic HubSpot markup, but no llms.txt) + non-form contact channel 1/1 (0800 number and email) = raw subtotal 8/9, scaled to 8.9. Crawl-policy deduction 0 — robots.txt applies no AI-crawler blocks.

  • Pricing extractable as text, e.g. "$32,510 +GST" for a 3-bay rural shed
  • robots.txt: no AI-crawler blocks, but no Sitemap declared; llms.txt returns 404
  • sitemap.xml is reachable directly and lists projects, case studies and category pages

Report findings

Ranked by likely impact. Each finding quotes the page it came from.

Worth fixing

Conversion path

Remove or delay the interruptive popup on load

A marketing popup ("Composting Barn Roadshow — Register now") fires on page load on both desktop and mobile, covering the hero and forcing a dismiss before the buyer can do anything. On mobile it hides the entire above-the-fold. Violates heuristic #3 (user control and freedom) and competes with the money path at the worst moment — first impression.

"Composting Barn Roadshow September 2026 — Register now" popup fires on load and covers the hero on desktop and mobile (verified in browser)

View the page

What to do

  • Delay the popup (exit-intent or after meaningful scroll) instead of firing on load.
  • Never let it cover the entire above-the-fold on mobile.
  • Suppress it for returning visitors and once dismissed.
  • Make sure the primary CTA is reachable without dismissing it.

Worth fixing

Conversion path

Surface the primary CTA in the mobile header

On desktop the "Design your shed" button sits prominently in the header — good. On mobile it disappears: the header shows only email, phone and a hamburger, and the menu doesn't list it either, so the primary money-path action only appears as an inline button once the buyer scrolls past the case-study hero. Mobile buyers have to hunt for the one action that matters.

Mobile header shows logo, email, phone and hamburger only; "Design your shed" is not in the header or the menu — it appears inline lower on the page (verified in browser at 375px)

View the page

What to do

  • Add a persistent "Design your shed" button to the mobile header or a sticky bar.
  • Include it as the first item in the mobile menu.
  • Keep the desktop header CTA as-is — it works well.
  • Re-test the mobile money path after the change.

Worth fixing

Conversion path

Put the enquiry form on the Contact page

The Contact page shows phone, email and address, but the enquiry form lives on a separate /enquiry page rather than being embedded where a warm buyer lands. Putting the form on the Contact page itself removes a click at the point of highest intent.

Contact page shows phone, email and address; the enquiry form is a separate /enquiry page, not embedded

View the page

What to do

  • Embed the enquiry form directly on the Contact page.
  • Add opening hours and a stated response time.
  • Keep the phone and email, and make them click-to-call / click-to-email on mobile.
  • Confirm each enquiry with an on-screen message and an email receipt.

Worth fixing

Proof depth

Put a number on more than one case study

The O'Leary composting barn lands a hard commercial result — "$300,000 increase per year in Milk Solids" — and it's the most persuasive proof on the site. Most other case studies stay qualitative. One number per study would turn a strong proof section into a decisive one.

O'Leary case study: "$300,000 increase per year in Milk Solids" — most other studies carry no comparable figure

View the page

What to do

  • Add one measurable outcome to each case study — cost, time, capacity, or a productivity gain.
  • Lead each study with the number where the client allows it.
  • Where figures aren't available, use size, timeframe or a client quote about the result.
  • Surface the strongest number on the project card, before the click.

Worth fixing

Trust & credibility

Add third-party proof to back the testimonials

The 20+ named testimonials are a real asset, but they are all self-published. A visible Google rating, an industry award, or a verifiable stat (years in business, number of buildings delivered) would let a cautious buyer verify the story rather than take it on faith.

20+ testimonials on site; "thousands of projects around NZ" — but no Google rating, awards or verifiable count shown

View the page

What to do

  • Add a live Google (or Trustpilot) rating with a link to the reviews.
  • Show any industry awards, memberships or building certifications.
  • Put a verifiable number on it — years in business or buildings delivered.
  • Keep the named testimonials — pair them with the third-party marks.

Worth fixing

Machine readability

Add an llms.txt and declare the sitemap in robots.txt

The site is otherwise very machine-readable — server-rendered, with extractable prices — but there is no llms.txt and the robots.txt doesn't declare the sitemap. As buyers increasingly ask AI assistants to shortlist builders and prices, these two small files make Aztech easier to find and quote correctly.

llms.txt returns 404; robots.txt has no Sitemap declaration

View the page

What to do

  • Publish an llms.txt summarising what Aztech builds, key pages and contact.
  • Add a Sitemap line to robots.txt pointing at sitemap.xml.
  • Keep prices and product facts as on-page text so they stay extractable.
  • Add Product/LocalBusiness schema to reinforce the machine-readable facts.

Worth checking

Conversion path

Tell enquirers what happens next and when

The site captures intent well but never sets expectations after an enquiry — there's no response-time promise and no description of the next step. For a considered purchase like a shed, a clear "here's what happens next" reduces drop-off and second-guessing.

No response-time or next-step description on the Contact page or after the CTAs

View the page

What to do

  • State a response time (e.g. we'll be in touch within one business day).
  • Describe the next step — a call, a site visit, an indicative design.
  • Send an automatic confirmation email after an enquiry.
  • Reassure that an enquiry is obligation-free.

Worth checking

Conversion path

Shorten the path to the shed designer and monitor its uptime

Driving the real journey shows the 3D designer is genuinely capable — a browser-verified strength — but reaching it takes two hops (homepage CTA → a landing page → a third-party portal at client.futura.nz), and that portal threw a transient server error on first load before recovering on retry. Extra steps and an off-brand tool that occasionally cold-starts with an error cost conversions at the highest-intent moment.

client.futura.nz/aztech returned "Application error: a server-side exception has occurred" on first load, then loaded normally on retry

View the page

What to do

  • Link the primary CTA straight to the designer, cutting the intermediate landing page.
  • Monitor the third-party designer's uptime and add a graceful fallback (enquiry form) if it errors.
  • Brand the portal transition so it doesn't feel like leaving Aztech.
  • Confirm the designer and Get Quote work on mobile.

Keep doing

Proof depth

Keep publishing indicative pricing up front

Publishing Quick AZ prices — from "$32,510 +GST" for a 3-bay rural shed — is rare in this category and does real work: it qualifies buyers, builds trust, and is exactly what an AI assistant can quote. Most competitors make people ask; Aztech doesn't.

Quick AZ pricing published, e.g. 3-bay rural shed from "$32,510 +GST"

View the page

What to do

  • Keep the indicative price ranges visible and current.
  • Make clear what the price includes and what's extra, to set expectations.
  • Keep prices as on-page text so buyers and AI assistants can read them.

Keep doing

Trust & credibility

Keep the wall of named testimonials and project spotlights

The volume and specificity of the proof — 20+ named customers and ~10 project spotlights across dairy, industrial and lifestyle — is a genuine strength. It shows range and lets a buyer find one like their own build. Don't thin it out.

20+ named testimonials and ~10 project spotlights (Vos Farms, ITM Matamata, O'Leary, and more)

View the page

What to do

  • Keep adding named testimonials and project spotlights as builds complete.
  • Keep them specific — name, region and building type.
  • Group spotlights by building type so buyers find a relevant one fast.

Keep doing

Message clarity

Keep the built-for-NZ-conditions positioning

The proposition is clear, local and confident — "New Zealand's Top Shed & Barn Builders", "built for New Zealand conditions". That local specificity is a strong qualifier and a real point of difference against generic kitset sellers. Keep it front and centre.

"New Zealand's Top Shed & Barn Builders"; "Sheds built for New Zealand conditions"

View the page

What to do

  • Keep the NZ-conditions, locally-built message as the hero.
  • Carry it into category and case-study pages.
  • Resist diluting a clear line with generic construction jargon.

Send me a copy of this report

All findings with their tasks, the four visitor journeys and the methodology. We will email it within one business day.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Methodology and limitations

This audit reviews the content and structure of the site's key pages and walks the primary money path — getting a quote — in a live browser at both desktop (1440px) and mobile (375px), evaluated against Nielsen Norman Group usability heuristics and measured for friction: clicks to goal, page hops, above-the-fold visibility and on-load interruptions. It assesses navigation and findability, message clarity, trust and credibility, proof depth and the conversion path, and separately scores how readable the site is to AI assistants and answer engines. Pages reviewed include the homepage, Contact, a case study, the shed designer, robots.txt and the sitemap. It is a UX and content review — not a page-speed or accessibility audit; for load performance, run Google PageSpeed Insights.

  • Homepage
  • Contact
  • Case study — Tyrone O'Leary composting barn
  • robots.txt
  • sitemap.xml